New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Rosie D. lawsuit prompts mandatory mental health screening in Mass.
(March 2008 Issue)

By Phyllis Hanlon

The escalating problem of "stuck kids," gaps in treatment and uncoordinated services drew statewide attention in Massachusetts and led to Rosie D. vs. Romney, a class action lawsuit filed in 2002. After a six-week trial in 2005, Judge Michael Ponser ruled that the Commonwealth had failed in its responsibility to adequately care for some 15,000 children with serious emotional disturbances (SED). The state proposed a remedial plan, whose first phase began on Dec. 31, 2007 when Massachusetts physicians were mandated to screen children on Medicaid for mental health problems.

Emily Sherwood, director, Children's Behavioral Health Interagency Initiatives within the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, explains that her office will devise ways to improve screening; create tools to better assess mental health; implement seven new services; and enhance information technology.

In the first phase, simple, standardized behavioral health questionnaires will be administered, according to Sherwood. "We consulted with developmental pediatricians and other experts within the state government and outside to develop a list of eight instruments to be used. These are not set in stone. The instruments will be reviewed annually," she says. Sherwood emphasizes that a child will be further assessed only if a problem is detected after screening.

The Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS) survey, which assesses diagnosis, risk factors, functioning and strengths and concerns for the child and the family, will also be used, says Sherwood.

Lisa Lambert, executive director, Parent/Professional Advocacy League (PPAL), points out that the screening is "voluntary for parents but not for pediatricians." She says, "The family can decline or refuse the mental health screening."

Lambert cites a Speak Out for Access survey, in which 48 percent of the families with children identified as having a behavioral problem should have been flagged before the age of four. This mandated screening hopes to prevent such lapses in the future.

She dismisses critics who believe the screening confirms a diagnosis and could lead to medication. The Church of Scientology has been the most vocal critic, creating a blog about the issue and expressing concern about the capacity of the system, says Lambert.

According to a brief prepared for the Massachusetts Medicaid Policy Institute (MMPI), a project funded by the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Foundation, the biggest challenge in implementing the required changes will be the shortage of qualified providers, including psychologists, social workers and bilingual/multi-cultural healthcare professionals, who can be trained "in the new delivery system," which differs significantly from the existing model.

Sherwood reports that the state is currently developing a training program and will sponsor in-person sessions for between 5,000 and 6,000 clinicians. Online training will also be available. Clinicians must attend one type of session and pass a test to become certified. "Psychologists will start hearing about the trainings sometime in late spring," she says.

According to David Matteodo, executive director of the Massachusetts Association of Behavioral Health Systems, this action constitutes a "holistic approach." He says, "this could be a landmark development in child medicine, in my opinion. Hopefully it will be a positive first phase."