New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Psychiatric research gets funding boost at MIT
and Harvard

(January 2008 Issue)

By Nan Shnitzler

The McGovern Institute for Brain Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) announced last fall that it received $20 million to establish the James W. and Patricia T. Poitras Center for Affective Disorders Research which will support research into the biological basis of serious mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression.

"Psychiatric research has lagged," says Charles Jennings, Ph.D., director of the McGovern's neurotechnology program. "We know less about the biological basis of psychiatric disease than cancer or cardiovascular disease."

In part, the lag is because of the exponential complexity of the task, in which genetics, brain physiology and environmental factors converge to manifest disease. But there is cause for optimism. Genetics technology and brain imaging have advanced dramatically in the last five years, Jennings says.

Another plus, he says, is that philanthropic funds free researchers to respond more quickly to opportunities and to try high risk, high payoff ideas that would be frowned upon by stricter funding sources such as the government.

"The ultimate goal is to understand how genetics and environmental risk factors interact in the brain to cause psychiatric disease," Jennings says. "We have the best chance than ever before to understand that," he says.

Other local institutions will coordinate research, particularly the Broad Institute at MIT and Harvard, which in March 2007 established the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, with a $100 million commitment from the Stanley Foundation, to focus on identifying the genes involved in brain-based disorders.

"By combining MIT's strengths in neuroscience with the Broad Institute's expertise in genetics, we can now launch a multi-pronged attack on the underlying causes of mental illness. Only through a large multidisciplinary effort can we hope to understand the causes of these very complex diseases," says Robert Desimone, Ph.D., director of the McGovern Institute.

But one can't do clinical studies without patients and preferably the participation of their families. That's where Massachusetts General Hospital and McLean Hospital come in. In fact, the Poitrases, who have a daughter with bipolar disorder, also funded research at McLean, says Bruce M. Cohen, M.D., Ph. D., former hospital president who now runs a research institute there. "What's unique about McLean, we have lots of patients that like to participate in studies. You can't do the genetics or brain imaging without that," Cohen says.

At McLean, clinicians identify the physical and behavioral characteristics of thousands of patients in great detail, Cohen says, which could help the genotyping performed at the Broad Institute reveal correlations.

"Sorting through three billion base pairs and trying to find associations with behaviors and illness, that's a huge amount of work," Cohen says. "The Stanley money will in large part make that highly technical sophisticated molecular research happen."

Researchers are in the process of prioritizing projects, Jennings says, but using functional imaging to look at brain action in psychiatric patient populations will be key. For example, imaging could reveal which brain regions are activated when patients carrying a potential risk gene respond in real time to external stimuli. The results could be compared to those who don't carry the gene.

"One can envisage a future in which we know the major risk genes, then people with a family history could be screened as children to do something prophylactically to reduce the risk of developing the disease later in life," Jennings says.

Another area ripe for results will be drug development because the theoretical basis for choosing the appropriate molecular target has been elusive, Jennings says.

Jennings laments that psychiatry and psychology today are too much based on trial and error and anticipates in the not too distant future a more theoretical approach to "understanding how patients differ, how drugs work and how treatment will be customized to individual patients."