New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Immediate Jeopardy status removed at Connecticut Valley Hospital
(December 2007 Issue)

By Ami Albernaz

After addressing problems related to patient safety and record keeping, Connecticut Valley Hospital in Middletown had its Immediate Jeopardy status removed by the Federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMMS) on Oct. 10. Connecticut Valley, the state's largest public psychiatric hospital, has been dogged by criticism in the wake of four patient suicides over the last four years.

The CMMS survey on Sept. 12 noted deficiencies related to patient assessment and progress reporting; building features such as door knobs, hinges and plumbing fixtures that could pose hazards to suicidal patients; and flawed documentation of patient interventions and responses to medication.

The measures the hospital undertook to meet CMMS's 23-day timeline for corrective action were part of an ongoing quality improvement process that had begun much earlier, says Wayne F. Dailey, Ph.D., a spokesman for Connecticut's Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

"There's a very intensive focus on the hospital and making sure all aspects of care provided there are of the highest quality," Dailey says.

Comprehensive risk assessments are administered to all patients, Dailey notes. Hospital staff now checks patient records more frequently to ensure they comply with CMMS standards and an electronic medical records system is currently being implemented.

Within the past year and a half, a new leadership team has been established at the hospital, and additional nurses and psychologists have been hired. Modifications to the building have been made to improve safety and staff presence has been increased in areas where needed changes have yet to be made.

The CMMS inspection followed the August release of a U.S. Department of Justice report faulting the hospital in the areas of patient protection, psychiatric and psychological services and discharge planning and placement. Among the specifics mentioned in the report was the use of seclusion and restraint; these have been reduced by 65 percent in the past year, Dailey says.

Despite the efforts made toward resolving the problems, some might be more pervasive than the new administration first realized, says Susan Aranoff, J.D., a staff attorney with the Connecticut Legal Rights Project, an independent advocacy agency housed on the Connecticut Valley campus.

Aranoff describes some longtime staff members' behavior as "shockingly recalcitrant," and says the new administration has experienced "significant push-back" in trying to implement some of the changes.

Still, she says, "I have no doubt that there's a commitment to change. Every day I'm impressed with the commitment of the administrative staff."

Future inspections of the facility will ensure that problems have been fixed, a Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services release stated.