New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Proposed reform delayed in Maine
(October 2005 Issue)

By Sean Smith

Maine will have to wait a little longer to roll out its proposed reform of the state's mental health care system.

Earlier this summer, the Maine Department of Health and Human Services unveiled a plan to move the mental health system to a managed care model, as had been mandated by lawmakers.

But in August, Maine Court Master Daniel E. Wathen rejected the state plan, saying it did not sufficiently gauge the cost of implementation or identify the means of meeting some of the expenses involved.

Wathen did accept the overall plan's "no wrong door" goals and principles in providing assistance to anyone contacting HHS offices or agencies, and the blueprint for managing the transition to managed care. All of these acceptances were cause for optimism even in the face of the rejection, according to Health and Human Services Deputy Commissioner Brenda Harvey. "The disapproval of the plan was based on lack of information, not in regard to the idea of managed care itself," says Harvey, interviewed last month. "Also, we're already dealing with some of the other concerns expressed, such as paying more attention to employment resources."

As Harvey sees it, Wathen's decision does not seriously detract from the move forward in the state's efforts to end the 15-year consent decree - the outcome of a class-action suit involving the Augusta Mental Health Institute (AMHI) - that has governed much of Maine's mental health care.

"For me, one critical thing is that [Wathen] approved the standards of performance that the state had devised for gauging our progress," Harvey says. "With the consent decree, it's hard to know where the goalposts are."

The decree was signed in 1990 by state officials to settle a lawsuit filed by Augusta Mental Health Institute patients who cited poor conditions at the facility. Among its goals, the decree - as explained in a summary of the document by the Maine Disability Rights Center - affirmed that patients be "the driving forces" in their own treatment planning and programs and mandated improvements in the quality, comprehensiveness and availability of mental health services.

Perhaps the decree's most dramatic impact, however, was requiring a reduction in the use of AMHI while directing increased support for "non-mental health system" services in the community. These included areas such as community hospitalization, housing, residential support services, crisis intervention and resolution services, vocational opportunities and training and transportation.

The decree originally estimated a completion date of Sept. 1, 1995, but the deadline was extended.

In 2003, Superior Court Chief Justice Nancy Mills ordered that a receiver be appointed to operate AMHI, reporting to Wathen, who was appointed as court master. Mills also authorized the appointment of a second receiver to operate the community-based mental health system but stayed the appointment for six months. In March of the following year, Wathen recommended that the system not be placed under a receiver.

This year saw the Maine Supreme Court reject Mills's plan for taking over some of the mental health system, while Maine legislators mandated a one-year transition to a managed care system and a cut in costs. "We are in an ongoing process," says Harvey. "Only the court can say when we are in compliance, and we'll continue to work with them toward that end."