|
        
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Alan
Bodnar, Ph.D. is the Co-Director of Psychology Training at Westborough
State Hospital, Mass. and a consultant in the field of leadership
development. |
 |
|
 |
|
By Alan Bodnar, Ph.D.
It all began when Thor couldn't get the Volvo started and Narvi
burst into tears. She couldn't take it anymore and now, on top of
everything else, it looked as if she was about to lose the simple
pleasure of a latte in the town café because it was just too cold
for anything to move. Why can't we just go back to the way things
used to be, Narvi cried out in desperation.
Why not indeed? And how did things used to be anyway? These and
other questions ran through the minds of the seven people gathered
around the table in the hospital's creative writing group. Three
of us were staff members and four were patients, but in this room
once a week, we are all writers trying to bring fictional characters
a step closer to the solution of their everyday problems. It is
surprising how much a group of motivated individuals can develop
a story in the short space of a 45-minute group. We write for 25
minutes and then take turns reading our stories out loud to the
group for the remaining 20 minutes. There is time for comment,
brief discussion and plenty of laughs as we shamelessly manipulate
the destinies of characters like Thor and Narvi who, on this particular
day, are the creations of one of the group's co-leaders.
Everyone is invited to try their hand at creating story stems.
The only requirement is to include one or more vividly described
characters in a particular setting facing a specific challenge.
Today with seven participants in the group, we emerge with seven
very different stories. No two people ever write the same story
just as no two people ever make the same adaptations even to similar
life challenges. A balky car battery in rural Iceland, chronic illness,
schizophrenia, substance abuse, the finer points of applying for
a job after a long, enforced absence from the workforce - all are
problems to be solved and, as such, lend themselves to rational
analysis and systematic action. Yet how many of us are always rational
and systematic and how many of us would want to be, even if we could?
Creatures of both thought and feeling, we live lives and create
characters in which rational and demonic forces contend for the
right to control our destinies. The outcome is determined not by
the winner, for the winner is rarely certain, but by the struggle
itself.
Who are Narvi and Thor? To one writer they are brother and sister,
abandoned by their parents, facing the unrelenting cold of a Nordic
winter and clinging only to each other as they wait for help that
never comes. To another, they are the poor and oppressed citizens
of a flawed government who are about to be rescued by a new, enlightened
and compassionate regime. Some see the pair as a recently married
couple either pulling together to meet life's challenges or, more
often, arguing and blaming one another for their predicament. Some
portray Thor as the rational problem solver bringing a more passive
Narvi along for the ride. For others, both members of the couple
have their own clear ideas about how to improve their situation
and the first question is whose plan of action will prevail.
How do Narvi and Thor meet the challenges before them? In one story,
they emigrate to North America where Thor finds a well-paying job
as an ice-road trucker and Narvi stays home to raise the couple's
children. Another writer's Thor is a dentist who finally makes a
go of it in the hinterland after losing his once-thriving practice
in the city after a prolonged illness. Sometimes, a little progress
goes a long way, as when one member of the group's characters break
through an impasse in their communication with a smile of apology
and a cup of tea. We never find out how this pair plans to get on
with their lives but we can be fairly sure they will be doing it
together. Not all of our group's Thors and Narvis are fortunate
enough to find even a temporary solution to their troubles and some
do not survive at all.
Thor and Narvi have much to teach their authors about facing life's
challenges, as do all of the characters that spring to life every
week in our group. We learn that there are many different ways to
view a situation and choices to make in developing a plot or living
a life. Every choice has its own consequences and some choices are
better than others. We do not judge each other as writers or as
human beings by the choices our characters make for, in the end,
we do not so much live in them as use them to explore alternative
ways of being or acting. Sigmund Freud described thought as "experimental
action" and what is writing, if not thinking on paper? Even when
our Thors and Narvis fail or fall short of their expectations, we
may be learning what not to do as we draw hope from the more positive
outcomes of other storylines. Last week, the fictional Narvi and
Thor were desperate to change their lives in Iceland, so we brought
them to America to change ours.
|
 |