|
        
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Alan
Bodnar, Ph.D. is the Co-Director of Psychology Training at Westborough
State Hospital, Mass. and a consultant in the field of leadership
development. |
 |
|
 |
|
By Alan Bodnar, Ph.D.
When is a story not a story? Ask Vince Teague, the 90-year-old
newspaper editor in Stephen King's novella, "The Colorado Kid,"
and he'll tell you, "When it doesn't have a beginning, a middle
or an end." News stories, according to Vince, have all three important
parts and convey the truth of a situation. Feature stories, on the
other hand, most often lack a clear ending except for the one conveniently
supplied by an author who needs some form of closure. Old Vince
calls these lies.
So where does that leave psychologists who tend to hear what our
patients tell us as stories of their lives so far? Because we can
never hear the end from a living narrator, our best guess at the
middle is entirely arbitrary and only the beginning is fixed in
time and space. As a result, we don't hear grand, sweeping epics
but instead encounter a good many novellas and short stories. Patients
come to tell us the stories of their panic attacks, compulsions,
the way their delusions cost them their most recent job, their marriage
or their relationship with their children. Presented with these
kinds of news stories having clear beginnings and middles, we can
consider our mandate to be one of helping our patients write more
satisfying endings.
Panic strikes. Panic cripples. Panic abates with cognitive behavior
therapy. Just as advertised, this is "all the news that's fit to
print."
We can never know all that is needed to erase the mystery from
our efforts to understand another person or, for that matter, ourselves.
Yet realizing our limits should not prevent us from doing all we
can to unearth the information that will help us illuminate the
beginning, an approximation of the middle and a prediction about
the end or, more precisely, what comes next. If Vince Teague were
a psychologist instead of a newspaper man, I suspect this is the
way he would go about our work. Nor would Vince be surprised by
the unanswerable questions. He has had to deal with a few mysteries
of his own in his more than 60 years on the staff of his local Maine
newspaper.
The mysteries we encounter in the office concern every phase of
our patients' lives, the beginning, the middle and the end. Regarding
the etiology or cause of a person's mental illness, our diagnostic
procedures will give us enough information to develop a reasonably
adequate formulation of the problem. Still, there will always be
questions that cannot be answered.
If we consider the middle of the story to be the chapter that the
person before us is currently living, we find mysteries here as
well. Why is it that some people respond to a variety of different
antipsychotic medications, while for others, only one seems to work?
What is it that finally convinces a person to accept his illness
and follow his treatment regimen after so many promising but ultimately
false starts?
We never hear the end of a patient's story first-hand, but we are
often called upon to give opinions about what our patients can reasonably
expect to achieve in the future. Is it reasonable for a young man
struggling with the symptoms of schizophrenia to go back to college
and try to finish his degree? Is it too much to expect a patient
with lingering symptoms of depression to return to work on a part-time
or full-time basis? A lament and a question heard frequently in
the hospital is the issue of whether or not a given individual will
ever be able to develop an intimate, loving, committed relationship.
If the literature of recovery and our experience as mental health
professionals teach us anything, it is the caution not to set limits
on what a person can achieve. On the other hand, it would be cruel
to encourage a person to pursue a patently unrealistic goal. Dreams
die and, when they do, we need to mourn their passing and fill the
space with new dreams that have a better chance of surviving.
Perhaps the best we can do as psychologists is to listen to our
patients' short stories and be a part of satisfying endings to tales
of discreet symptoms or stressful life events. Even so, we do this
in the context of the grand unfinished narrative that we try to
understand in all its complexity but respect and cherish in its
unfathomable mystery. When Vince Teague, Stephen King's grizzly
newspaper editor, was working as the paper's photographer 60 years
earlier, he took a picture of some unexplained lights that appeared
over the town during a little league baseball game. Some spectators
were curious and others were afraid. "And on the mound, the little
boy who had been pitching held his glove up to one of the bright
circles which hung in the sky just below the clouds as if to touch
that mystery and bring it close and open its heart and know its
story." The author doesn't say, but I wonder if that boy grew up
to become a psychologist.
|
 |